One of the two men vying to be First Minister has accused Wales second biggest union of a “stitch” up after it backed his rival. Education Minister Jeremy Miles said he was only told after taking part in the Unite nomination hustings that he was ineligible to win the union's backing.

Mr Miles and his rival to replace Mark Drakeford, economy minister Vaughan Gething, were interviewed by the Welsh political committee of Unite the Union. But before the vote for which would get Unite’s nomination, Mr Miles was declared ineligible because he had never been a lay official of the union.

In a dramatic statement this afternoon Mr Miles said the union never mentioned apparently new rules making him ineligible, until after he had been asked to make his case for nomination. He said the committee that interviewed him were unaware the new rule had been introduced and they were blocked from voting.

Read more: Welsh Government minister cleared of breaking ministerial code over 'not totally correct' comments

Read next: Drink-driver smeared blood on officers and defecated in police van

Vaughan Gething, Minister for Economy
Vaughan Gething, Minister for Economy

He said: “I participated in the Unite the Union nomination hustings for the Welsh Labour Leadership on 17 January. Both candidates for the leadership spoke and answered questions.

“During the discussion held after the hustings by the political committee to nominate their preferred candidate, I understand they were told for the first time that I was ineligible to be nominated by the union due to a new rule that no one was aware of, had not been published and which hadn’t been applied previously. The political committee was then prevented from voting to express a view on the candidates, in light of this new rule. This new rule was not declared when I was invited by Unite to attend and participate in the nomination hustings.

“Neither was it referred to during the hustings. After the hustings concluded, the leadership of Unite failed to mention it to me. To date, I have not seen any evidence the rule even exists for the purpose claimed.”

Mr Miles said he was invited by Unite to the hustings to contest for the Unite nomination. His supporters said he had broad support, and was likely to win the nomination.

Mr Miles’ campaign office said the rule Unite introduced suddenly hasn’t been applied before and there was no evidence that the drafting of such a rule even covers Labour party leadership elections.

“Jeremy was not informed before, during or after about any alleged issues with his eligibility.Requests to Unite for fairness and common sense have been rebuffed.

“The campaign’s letter to General Secretary Sharon Graham hasn’t been answered. A senior official of the Unite has told Jeremy they stand by their decision.

“Retrospectively changing the rules after a process has begun would be unacceptable to trade unionists representing their members in the workplace.

“We thank the whistleblowers at all levels in Unite who have made sure this stitch up was not kept secret.”

Unite the Union was approached for comment.

STATEMENT FROM JEREMY MILES MS ON THE UNITE NOMINATION

I participated in the Unite the Union nomination hustings for the Welsh Labour Leadership on 17 January. Both candidates for the leadership spoke and answered questions.

During the discussion held after the hustings by the political committee to nominate their preferred candidate, I understand they were told for the first time that I was ineligible to be nominated by the union due to a new rule that no one was aware of, had not been published and which hadn’t been applied previously. The political committee was then prevented from voting to express a view on the candidates, in light of this new rule.

This new rule was not declared when I was invited by Unite to attend and participate in the nomination hustings. Neither was it referred to during the hustings. After the hustings concluded, the leadership of Unite failed to mention it to me. To date, I have not seen any evidence the rule even exists for the purpose claimed.

Members will rightly expect that rules to nominate a candidate for the next leader of our party and our government should be transparent and be applied fairly.

A longstanding trade unionist has said to me: if this can happen to a candidate for Welsh Labour leader, and First Minister of Wales, how will lay members wishing to progress in the union be treated? This is a fair question.

The support I’ve gained in this contest is based on hard work in the Senedd and with local government since I was first elected in 2016. There are those who may feel others are more entitled to support because they have been around longer. Everyone is entitled to their view. But the way to express their view is through the proper democratic process.

I’m standing to lead an inclusive government in a nation where opportunities are open to everyone. I have an ambitious programme that includes defending and extending workers’ rights, and the urgent fight to protect high quality jobs - things that the majority of Unite members and officials stand for.

I did not want to make a statement like this, but so many union members have made it clear publicly that they are deeply unhappy with the way the nomination has been made. I am standing up for the principle of fairness and equal treatment, as any good trade unionist would.